The mediating role of goal orientation and learned helplessness in the relationship between implicit theories of intelligence and academic achievement

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor/ Tabriz University

2 PhD Student/ Tabriz University

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate assumed model of relationship between implicit theories of intelligence and academic achievement with mediating goal orientation and learned helplessness. To test the model, 253 boys and girls students in the first grade of high school including from five regions of Tabriz were selected by multistage cluster sampling. For collecting data, Achievement Goal Questionnaire, Implicit Theories of Intelligence Scale and Learned Helplessness Scale were used. The results of path analysis indicated that the theory of entity intelligence related with performance goals and incremental theory associated with mastery goals. The negative effect of entity theory on achievement through learned helplessness and its positive effect is through performance goals. Incremental theory of intelligence in addition to direct effect on achievement has indirect positive effect through mastery goals. Learned helplessness has negative effect on achievement both direct as well as indirect through performance and mastery goals. Performance and mastery goals both have positive and significant relationship with academic achievement. Based on results of this study suggested that, for attaining higher academic achievement, schools promote incremental beliefs of intelligence and reduce learned helplessness among students.

Keywords


  1.  

    1. برزگر، مجید؛ علی دلاور و حسن احدی (1391). ”نقش واسطه‌ای الگوی چهاربخشی هدف‌های پیشرفت و راهبردهای شناختی در رابطه‌ی بین نظریه‌‌های ضمنی هوش و پیشرفت تحصیلی (یک مدل علّی)“. فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی، سال سوم، شماره 2، صص. 86-71.
    2. دفترچی، عفت و راضیه شیخ‌الاسلامی (1392). ”نقش برآورده شدن نیازهای اساسی روانشناختی در جهت‌‌گیری هدف دانش‌آموزان“. مجله روان‌شناسی، 67 ، سال هفدهم، شماره 3، صص. 347-330.
    3. عطایی‌فر، ربابه و فرهاد شقاقی (1389). ”رابطه جهت‌گیری هدف، یادگیری خودتنظیم با پیشرفت تحصیلی در دانش‌آموزان دختر سال سوم رشته ریاضی- فیزیک و علوم انسانی“. فصلنامه تعلیم و تربیت، شماره 16، صص. 65-49.
    4. واحدی، شهرام؛ جلیل فتح‌آبادی و سونیا اکبری(1389). ”الگوی میانجی احساس تنهایی هیجانی و اجتماعی، بهزیستی معنوی، فاصله اجتماعی و افسردگی دانشجویان دختر“. فصلنامه روان‌شناسی کاربردی، 4(16)،24-7.
    5. هاشمی، زهرا و محمد خیّر (1387). ”بررسی رابطه‌ ابعاد فراشناخت عاطفی و جهت‌گیری هدف“. فصلنامه عملی- پژوهشی روان‌شناسی دانشگاه تبریز. سال سوم، شماره 11، صص. 150-127.
    6. هرینگتون، دی. (2009). تحلیل عاملی تأییدی. (ترجمه شهرام واحدی، محمد مقدم و پیروز قادری پاکدل، 1391). تبریز: انتشارات دانشگاه تبریز.

     

    7. Abd-El-Fattah, S. M., & Yates, G. (2006). “Implicit theory of intelligence scale: Testing for factorial invariance and mean structure”. Paper presented at the AARE Annual Conference, Adelaide 2006. Available at: www.aare.edu.au/06pap/abd06289.pdf

    8. Ames, C. (1992). “Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation”. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.

    9. Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). “Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent tradition: A longitudinal study and an intervention.” Child Development, 78, 246–263.

    1. Daniels, L. M., Stupniski, R. H., Pekrun, R., Haynes, T. L., Perry, R. P., & Newall, N. E. (2009). “A longitudinal analysis of achievement goals: From effective antecedence to emotional effects and achievement outcomes”. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 948-963.
    2. Dweck, C. S., & Elliott, E. S. (1983). “Achievement motivation. In P. H. Mussen & E. M. Hetherington” (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. IV. Social and personality development (pp. 643–691). New York: Wiley.
    3. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). “A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. ” Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
    4. Dweck, C. S., & Master, A. (2009). “Self-theories and motivation: Student’s beliefs about intelligence. ” In K. R.Wentzel, & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school. (pp. 123-140). NY: Routledge.
    5. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). “A 2 × 2 Achievement Goal Framework.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519.
    6. Hoeksema, S. N., Girgus, J. S., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1986). “Learned helplessness in children: A longitudinal study of depression, achievement, and explanatory style”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 435-442.
    7. Hong, Y., Chiu, C., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D. M., & Wan, W. (1999). “Implicit theories, attributions and coping: A meaning system approach.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588-599.
      1. Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (2007). “The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory.” Educational Psychology Review, 19, 141–184.
    8. Maehr, M. L., & Meyer, H. A. (1997). “Understanding motivation and schooling: Where we’ve been, where we are, and where we need to go.” Educational Psychology Review, 9(4), 371–409.
    9. Mattern, R. A. (2005). College students’ goal orientation and achievement. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17, 27-32.
    10. Nicholls, J. G. (1984). “Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance.” Psychological Review, 91, 328–346.
    11. Pekrun, R. (2006). “The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice.” Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341.
    12. Quinless, F.W., & Nelson, M.A.M. (1988). “Development of a measure of learned helplessness.” Nursing Research, 37(1), 11-15.
    13. Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
    14. Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. P., & Teasdale, J. D. (1978). “Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformation.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 49-74.
    15. Weiner, B. (1979). “A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3—25.