اسدی گرمارودی ج. 1389. مسئلهی پولیا، آموزش ریاضی، 28 (2)، 8-4.
جعفرشکوهی م، امیریان زاده م. 1393. یادگیری خودتنظیمی، نخستین همایش ملی الکترونیکی رویکردهای کاربردی و پژوهشی در علوم انسانی و مدیریت، قم.
جلالی خ، امینی س. 1396. نوآوری، خلاقیت و کارآفرینی، دومین کنفرانس ملی رویکردهای نوین در آموزش و پژوهش، محمودآباد.
حسنی جعفری ف، عباسی ا. 1399. مقایسه یادگیری الکترونیکی در راهبرد مهارتهای خودتنظیمی و انگیزش تحصیلی در مدارس عادی و الکترونیکی در رشته ی علوم تجربی،https://civilica.com/doc/1220915
دانا مجنده س، زاهدبابلان ع. 1401. مروری بر نقش مشارکت تحصیلی والدین در جهت گیری هدف دانش آموزان، سومین همایش ملی مدرسه آینده، اردبیل.
زیدی اصل ا. 1397. بررسی تاثیر سخت رویی و خلاقیت دانشجویان بر کارآفرینی آنان (مطالعه موردی؛ دانشگاه ایلام)، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد بودجه مالی عمومی، دانشگاه ایلام، صص 155-1.
گرام یاری ل، مقصودی ر، پورآزادثانی م، خوش منش ر. 1402. مطالعه اثربخشی تدریس بر مبنای بازی بر میزان یادگیری درس ریاضی دانش آموزان پایه پنجم ابتدایی شهرستان ارومیه، هفتمین همایش بین المللی مطالعات دینی، علوم انسانی و اخلاق زیستی در جهان اسلام، ایران- تهران.
میهمی ح، داسمه پ، باستان م. 1397. تاثیر آموزش خلاقیت بر عوامل شناختی مرتبط با خلاقیت: گزارشی از طرح مدارس فصلی خلاقیت و ایده پردازی در فارس، نشریه: مطالعات آموزش و یادگیری (علوم اجتماعی و انسانی دانشگاه شیراز)، دوره 10، شماره 1، پیاپی (1-74)، صص 229-206.
ناروئی م، قزلسفلی م، ممشلی ا. 1402. اختلال یادگیری دانش آموزان، علائم و درمان، چهارمین کنفرانس ملی مدیریت، روان شناسی و علوم رفتاری، ایران- تهران.
Alvi, E., & Gillies, R. M. (2024). Investigating the individual nature of teacher beliefs and practices about self-regulated learning and how this shapes their practices for supporting student learning. Educ. Stud. 50, 516–538. doi: 10.1080/03055698.2021.1966757
Asare, B., Dissou Arthur, Y., & Adu Obeng, B. (2025). Mathematics self-belief and mathematical creativity of university students: the role of problem-solving skills. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2456438
Aydan, S. & Mamas (2025). Another brick in the wall to understand the complex process of self-regulated learning: general and domain-specific features of SRL. Educ. Sci. 15:293. doi: 10.3390/educsci15030293
Azevedo, R., Rosário, P., Magalhães, P., Núñez, J. C., Pereira, B., & Pereira, A. (2023). A tool-kit to help students from low socioeconomic status background: a school-based self-regulated learning intervention. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 38, 495–518. doi: 10.1007/s10212-022-00607-y
Benick, M., Dörrenbächer-Ulrich, L., Weißenfels, M., & Perels, F. (2021). Fostering self regulated learning in primary school students: can additional teacher training enhance the effectiveness of an intervention? Psychol. Learn. Teach. 20, 324–347. doi: 10.1177/14757257211013638
Bicer, A., Lee, Y., Perihan, C., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2020). Considering mathematical crea tive self-efficacy with problem posing as a measure of mathematical creativity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105, 457–485. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10649- 020- 09995-8
Butler, D. L., and Cartier, S. C. (2004). Promoting effective task interpretation as an important work habit: A key to successful teaching and learning. Teachers college record 106, 1729–1758.
Callan, G., Longhurst, D., Shim, S., and Ariotti, A. (2022). Identifying and predicting teachers’ use of practices that support SRL. Psychol. Schs. 59, 2327–2344. doi: 10.1002/pits.22712
Chen, W. W., & Wong, Y. L. 2015. The relationship between goal orientation and academic achievement in Hong Kong: The role of context. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(1), 169-176.
Chen, J. (2022). The effectiveness of self-regulated learning (SRL) interventions on L2 learning achievement, strategy employment and self-efficacy: a meta-analytic study. Front. Psychol. 13:1021101. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1021101
Cockcroft, K., & Hartgill, M. (2004). Focusing on the abilities in learning disabilities: Dyslexia and creativ ity. Education as Change, 8(1), 61–79.
De Caroli, M. E., & Sagone, E. (2010). Mental synthesis and creative thinking in learning disabled children. In Proceedings presented to the IASK International Conference on Teaching and Learn ing, 272–279.
Dent, A. L., and Koenka, A. C. (2015). The relation between self-regulated learning and academic achievement across childhood and adolescence: a meta-analysis. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 28, 425–474. doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9320-8
De Smedt, B., & Boets, B. (2010). Phonological processing and arithmetic fact retrieval: Evidence from developmental dyslexia. Neuro psychologia, 48(14), 3973–3981. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. neuro psych ologia. 2010. 10. 018
Geary, D. C., & Hoard, M. K. (2005). Learning disabilities in arithmetic and mathematics: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), The Handbook of Mathematical Cognition (pp. 253–267). Psychology Press.
Gurganus, S. P. (2020). Math instruction for students with learning problems. Taylor & Francis.
Hughes, C. A., Morris, J. R., Therrien, W. J., & Benson, S. K. (2017). Explicit instruction: Historical and contemporary contexts. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(3), 140–148. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ ldrp. 12142
Khasawneh, M. A. S. (2024). The Impact of Self-Regulation-Based Strategies in Improving Learning Scientific Concepts Among Students with Learning Disabilities in the Intermediate Stage. International Journal of Special Education, 39(2), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.52291/ijse.2024.39.21
Kim, H., Cho, S., & Ahn, D. (2004). Development of mathematical creative problem-solving ability test for identification of the gifted in math. Gifted Education International, 18(2), 164–174. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 02614 29403 01800 206
Kim, M. K., Roh, I. S., & Cho, M. K. (2016). Creativity of gifted students in an integrated math-sci ence instruction. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 38–48. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. tsc. 2015. 07. 004
Kingsdorf, S., & Krawec, J. (2014). Error analysis of mathematical word problem solving across stu dents with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(2), 66–74. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ ldrp. 12029
Leikin, R. (2009). Exploring mathematical creativity using multiple solution tasks. In R. Leikin, A. Ber man & B. Koichu (Eds.) Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students, (pp. 129 135), Sense Publishers. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1163/ 97890 87909 352_ 010
Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2007). Multiple solution tasks as a magnifying glass for observation of math ematical creativity. 30 Proceedings of the 31st conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 161–168). PME.
Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2013). Mathematical creativity in generally gifted and mathematically excelling adolescents: What makes the difference? ZDM‐Mathematics Education, 45, 183–197. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11858- 012- 0460-8
Levenson, E. S., & Dasuqi, A. (2024). Exploring group work on open-ended geometrical tasks: Face to-face and online. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1–22. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10763- 024- 10532-9
Levenson, E. S., & Molad, O. (2022). Analyzing collective mathematical creativity among post high school students working in small groups. ZDM‐Mathematics Education, 54(1), 193–209. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11858- 021- 01321-7
Levenson, E. S., Swisa, R., & Tabach, M. (2018). Evaluating the potential of tasks to occasion math ematical creativity: Definitions and measurements. Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 273–294. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 14794 802. 2018. 14507 77
Mann, E. L. (2006). Creativity: The essence of mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(2), 236–260. https:// doi. org/ 10. 4219/ jeg- 2006- 264
Marita, S., & Hord, C. (2017). Review of mathematics interventions for secondary students with learn ing disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40(1), 29–40. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 07319 48716 657495
Matejko, A. A., Lozano, M., Schlosberg, N., McKay, C., Core, L., Revsine, C., Davis, S. N., & Eden, G. F. (2023). The relationship between phonological processing and arithmetic in children with learn ing disabilities. Developmental Science, 26(2), Article e13294. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ desc. 13294
Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., Middleton, M., Maehr, M. L., Urdan, T.,Anderman, L. H., ... & Roeser, R. (1998). The development and validation of scales assessing students' achievement goal orientations. Contemporary educational psychology, 23(2), 113-131
Nufus H, Muhandaz R, Hasanuddin, Nurdin E, Ariawan R, Fineldi RJ, Hayati IR, Situmorang DDB. Analyzing the students' mathematical creative thinking ability in terms of self-regulated learning: How do we find what we are looking for? Heliyon. 2024 Jan 20;10(3):e24871. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24871. PMID: 38318009; PMCID: PMC10838748.
Raghubar, K., Cirino, P., Barnes, M., Ewing-Cobbs, L., Fletcher, J., & Fuchs, L. (2009). Errors in multi digit arithmetic and behavioural inattention in children with math difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(4), 356–371. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 00222 19409 335211
Rosenzweig, C., Krawec, J., & Montague, M. (2011). Metacognitive strategy use of eighth-grade stu dents with and without learning disabilities during mathematical problem solving: A think-aloud analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(6), 508–520. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 00222 19410 378445
Tan, P., & Lambert, R. (2019). Disability and educators in mathematics schooling research: A critical exploratory review. Review of Disability Studies: An International Journal, 15(1)
Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance test of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Ginn
Torrance, E. P. (1992). A national climate for creativity and invention. Gifted Child Today Magazine, 15(1), 10-14.
Schuler, N., Villiger, C., and Krauß, E. (2024). Effects of a teacher-led intervention fostering self-regulated learning and reading among 5th and 6th graders—treatment integrity matters. Educ. Sci. 14:778. doi: 10.3390/educsci14070778
Vale, I., Pimentel, T., spsampsps Barbosa, A. (2018). The power of seeing in problem solving and crea tivity: An issue under discussion. In Carreira, S., Amado, N. spsampsps Jones, K. (Eds.), Broaden ing the scope of research on mathematical problem solving: A focus on technology, creativity and affect, 243–272. Springer International Publishing. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ 978-3- 319- 99861 9_ 11
Wilson, J. (1985). The role of metacognition in English education. English Education, 17(4), 212-221
Wilson, J., & Hunt, J. H. (2022). Marginalized within the margins: Supporting mathematics meaning making among students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 67, Arti cle 100982. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jmathb. 2022. 100982
Yssel, N., Adams, C., Clarke, L. S., & Jones, R. (2014). Applying an RTI model for students with learn ing disabilities who are gifted. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(3), 42–52. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 00400 59914 04600 305
Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). “Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: an overview and analysis” in Self-regulated learning and academic achievement Eds. Barry J. Zimmerman and Dale H. Schunk. (Abingdon: Routledge), 45.
)